Menopausal Status and Central Corneal Thickness: Differences and Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65129/surgical.v1i2.32Keywords:
Menopause, Central Corneal Thickness, Glaucoma, Intraocular Pressure, Menopause, Postmenopause, Ultrasonic PachymetryAbstract
Purpose: To compare the Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) measured using ultrasonic pachymetry in pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women and discuss the need for incorporating menopausal status into glaucoma risk stratification and interpretation of IOP recordings. Materials and Methods: This was an observational cross-sectional study for a period of 2 years from May 2023 to May 2025 conducted at the Regional Institute of Ophthalmology and Government Ophthalmic Hospital, Chennai. 300 eyes of 150 females were part of the study- 75 pre and post-menopausal women. Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) was measured using ultrasonic pachymetry and data analysed statistically as in Table 2. Results: In our study, the mean age of the pre-menopausal females was 42.253 ± 8.311 while the mean age of the post-menopausal females was found to be 60.053 ± 7.274. As expected, the mean age of Post-Menopausal Females was significantly higher than that of the pre-menopausal females (p-value <0.001). The mean central corneal thickness, as measured by ultrasonic pachymetry was found to be 546.63 ± 42.36 microns in the pre-menopausal category and 521.59 ± 32.02 microns in the post-menopausal category. An independent samples t-test revealed the CCT to be significantly lesser in post-menopausal females compared to pre-menopausal females. (t = 6.46, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Menopause is thus associated with thinner CCT values and thus plays a pivotal role in the approach and evaluation of post-menopausal glaucoma patients.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Surgery and Surgical Specialities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Keskin N, Cantürk S, Aydin S, Saygili H, Ozgün C. An objective method to determine corneal changes during menopause. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 36(3):176-8. PMID: 19860363.
2. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology. 2001; 108(10):1779-88. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S01616420(01)00760-6 PMid:11581049.
3. Turgut FG, Turgut A, Dolgun ZN, Köroğlu N. Effects of menopause on corneal topography and dry eye. Int J ReprodContracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 6(2):461-465. https://doi.org/10.18203/23201770.ijrcog20170067
4. Verma N, Gupta P, Sharma A. Evaluation of difference in central corneal thickness between premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Int J Res Med Sci. 2023; 11(9):3256. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20232777
5. Rao SH. Evaluation of central corneal thickness with meibomian gland dysfunction in postmenopausal women (Master’s thesis, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India)).
6. Sanchis Gimeno JA, Lleó Pérez A, Alonso L, Rahhal MS, Martínez Soriano F. Reduced corneal thickness values in postmenopausal women with dry eye. Cornea. 2005; 24(1):39-46. https://doi.org/10.1097/01. ico.0000138836.45070.0f PMid:15604865.
7. Spoerl E, Zubaty V, Raiskup-Wolf F, Pillunat LE. Oestrogeninduced changes in biomechanics in the cornea as a possible reason for keratectasia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 91(11):1547-50. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.124388 PMid:17591 666 PMCid:PMC2095430
8. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106(11):2144-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420 (99)90497-9 PMid:10571351.
9. Hulsman CA, Westendorp IC, Ramrattan RS, Wolfs RC, Witteman JC, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Is open-angle glaucoma associated with early menopause? The Rotterdam Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 15; 154(2):138-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/154.2.138 PMid:11447046.
10. Pensyl D, Sullivan-Mee M, Torres-Monte M, Halverson K, Qualls C. Combining corneal hysteresis with central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for glaucomarisk assessment. Eye (Lond). 2012; 26(10):1349-56. Epub 2012;10. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2012.164 PMid: 22878449. PMCid: PMC3470051.
