Four Flap Rhytidectomy Approach for the treatment of Dislocated Sub Condylar Fractures of Mandible
Abstract
To analyze the outcome of modified
rhytidectomy approach through four flaps
for the ORIF of displaced Subcondylar
fractures of the mandible. 14 cadaveric
specimens studied for facial nerve anatomy
10 clinical cases with dislocated sub
condylar fractures operated through four
flap rhytidectomy approach. The morbidity
of neuropraxic facial palsy is significantly
less when compared to the benefit
of open access and anatomical reduction
of these fractures. This approach goes a
long way in reducing morbidity in the
form of TM joint arthritis and internal derangement
of the joint. This surgical approach
is useful for ORIF of fractures in
the condyle, subcondyle and upper ramus
regions of mandible through skin
flap, SMAS flap, Glandular flap and
pterygomasseteric sling flap.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Lee HC, Kang DH, Koo SH, et al.
Outcome of open reduction via retromandibular
approach for mandibular subcondyle
fracture. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr
Surg 2005; 32:739-43.
Jang JY, Kang DH. Comparison study
of open reduction and closed reduction
in treatment of mandibular subcondylar
fractures. J Korean Cleft Palate-
Craniofac Assoc 2008; 9:51-4.
Zide MF, Kent JN. Indications for open
reduction of mandibular condyle fractures.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983; 41:89
-98.
Kleinheinz J, Meyer C. Fractures of the
mandibular condyle: basic considerations
and treatment. London: Quintessence
Publishing Company; 2009.
Lee W, Kang DH. Study of the plating
methods in the experimental model of
mandibular subcondyle fracture. J Korean
Cleft Palate-Craniofac Assoc 2011;
:12-6.
Hinds EC, Girotti WJ. Vertical subcondylar
osteotomy: a reappraisal.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1967;
:164-70.
Cienfuegos R, Carl-Peter Cornelius
CP, Ellis E 3rd. ET al.Mandible: retromandibular
approaches [Internet].
Switzerland: AO Foundation; 2011
[cited 2012 Jun 27]. Available from:
Tang W, Gao C, Long J, et al. Application
of modified retromandibular
approach indirectly from
the anterior edge of the parotid gland
in the surgical treatment of condylar
fracture.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67:552-
Choi BH, Kim KN, Kim HJ, et al.
Evaluation of condylar neck fracture
plating techniques.J Craniomaxillofac
Surg 1999; 27:109-12.
Tominaga K, Habu M, Khanal A,
et al. Biomechanical evaluation of
different types of rigid internal fixation
techniques for subcondylar fractures.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64:1510
-6.
Silverman SL. A new operation
for displaced fractures at the neck of
the mandibular condyle. Dental Cosmos
; 67:876-7.
Throckmorton GS, Dechow PC.
In vitro strain measurements in the
condylar process of the human mandible.
Arch Oral Biol 1994; 39:853-
13. Meyer C, Kahn JL, Boutemi P, et al.
Photo elastic analysis of bone deformation
in the region of the mandibular
condyle during mastication. J Craniomaxillofac
Surg 2002; 30:160-9.
Ellis E 3rd, Dean J. Rigid fixation of
mandibular condyle fractures. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76:6-15.
Throckmorton GS, Ellis E 3rd, Hayasaki
H. Masticatory motion after surgical
or nonsurgical treatment for unilateral
fractures of the mandibular condylar
process. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;
:127-38.
Meyer C, Serhir L, Boutemi P. Experimental
evaluation of three osteosynthesis
devices used for stabilizing condylar
fractures of the mandible. J Craniomaxillofac
Surg 2006; 34:173-81.
Eckelt U, Schneider M, Erasmus F, et
al. Open versus closed treatment of fractures
of the mandibular condylar process
-a prospective randomized multi-centre
study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006;
:306-14.
Baker, D. C. & Conley, J. Avoiding
facial nerve injuries in rhytidectomy. Anatomical
variations and pitfalls.
Plast.Reconstr. Surg., 64(6):781-95,
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
An Initiative of The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University