Role of Blue on Yellow perimetry in the early detection of glaucomatous damage.
Abstract
Abstract : Blue on yellow perimetry is a modification of
standard automated perimetry using the same perimeter and
programs. It utilizes a 440 nm Goldmann type V stimulus at
200 milliseconds duration on a 100 candelasm2 yellow
background to test selectively the short wavelength sensitive
cones and their connection. The test is most likely processed
by the small bistratified blue on yellow ganglion cells, which
encompass approximately 5 of total population of retinal
ganglion cells. Blue on yellow perimetry or Short Wavelength
automated perimetry can detect early visual field loss before a
reduction in differential light sensitivity is shown with standard
White on White perimetry. The principle of Blue on Yellow
perimetry is to measure the sensitivity of the blue sensitive
cones in contrast with a yellow background. Blue on Yellow
perimetry tends to test a subset of retinal ganglion cells that
are lost in glaucoma.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Stamper RL , Liebermann MF, Drake MV. Becker –
Shaffer Diagnosis and Therapy ofglaucoma. St Louis:
Mosby.
Quigley HA, Number of people with glaucoma
worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol, 1996:80:380
Thylefors B, Negrel AD: The global impact of
glaucoma, Bull World health org: 1994:72:323.
Thylefors B, Negrel AD: The global impact on blindness,
Bull World health org: 1995:73-115.
Johnson, CA Adams, AJ, Casson, EJ, Brandt, JD:
Blue-on-Yellow perimetry can predict the development
of glaucomatous visual field loss. Archives of
Ophthalmology , 1993, 111:645-650
Mansberger SL, Sample PA, Zangwill LM and Weinreb
RN, Achromatic and short-wavelength automated
perimetry in patients with glaucomatous large cups.
Archives of Ophthalmology, 1999, 117: 1473-1477
Sit AJ, Medieros FA and Weibren RN, Short Wavelength
automated perimetry can predict glaucomatous
standard visual loss by ten years. Semin Ophthalmol,
, 19: 122-124
Comparison of
W-W and B-Y
perimetry
Number of
eyes Percentage
Both W-W and
B-Y normal 50 32
W-W Normal but
B-Y Abnormal 58 37
W-W Normal but
B-Y borderline 29 18
Both borderline 5 3
W-W borderline
B-Y abnormal 10 6
W-W borderline
B-Y normal 1 1
W-W abnormal
B-Y normal 3 2
W-W abnormal
B-Y borderline 2 1
Total 158 100%
An Initiative of The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University
University Journal of Surgery and Surgical Specialities
Johnson CA , The diagnostic value of Short Wavelength
Automated Perimetry (SWAP). Current Opinion in Ophthalmology,
, 7:54-58.
Demirel, S. and C.A Johnson, Short wavelength automated
perimetry (SWAP) in ophthalmic practice. J Am Optom Assoc,
67:451-456.
Demirel, S. and C.A Johnson, Incidence and prevalence of short
wavelength automated perimetry deficits in ocular hypertensive
patients, Am J Ophthalmol, 2001 131: 709-715.
Landers, J,. I. Goldberg, and S. Graham, A comparison of short
wavelength automatedperimetry with frequency doubling perimetry
for the early detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension.
Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 2000. 28: 248-252.
Johnson CA , Recent developments in automated perimetry in
glaucoma diagnosis and
management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2002. 13(2): p. 77 – 84.
Sample PA, Medieros FA Recette L, Pascual J, Boden C,
Zangwill LM, Bowd C and Weinreb RN, Identifying glaucomatous
vision loss with visual function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic
innovations in glaucoma study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006 ,
: 3381-3389.
Wild JM, Short wavelength automated perimetry. Acta
Ophthalmol Scand, 2001, 79:546- 559
Racette L and Sample PA, Short wavelength automated
perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2003, 16:227-236.
Landers, J,. Sharma A, Goldberg I , and Graham S, Topography
of the frequency doubling perimetry visual field compared with that
of short wavelength and achromatic automated perimetry visual
fields. Br J Ophthalmol, 2006. 90: 70-74.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
An Initiative of The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University