OUTCOME OF RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION OF VARIOUS STAGES OF VARICOSE VEINS
Abstract
Aim:
To study the outcome of Radiofrequency Ablation of varicose veins and its complications.
Methods and Materials:
We have done prospective study of 202 patients and 224 limbs of various stages of varicose vein, admitted in Government Kilpauk Medical College Hospital, Chennai, over a period of 15 months from the year 2013 to 2014. All patients were evaluated with Duplex- Doppler examination, in addition to routine investigations and underwent endovenous continuous RF ablation. Patients were followed up for 6 months period and findings were recorded.
Results:
The post- operative pain score, ulcer healing rate and complication rates were evaluated. The visual analogue score for pain dropped from an average of 7 to 2 at the end of 8 weeks and faster ulcer healing rate. The paresthesia, superficial thrombophlebitis and recanalizations rates were 2.6, 8.2 and 1.9 respectively. There were no cases of deep vein thrombosis observed in our study.
Conclusion:
Endovenous continuous radiofrequency ablation is safer and faster method of treating all stages of varicose vein and more patients are opting for endovenous ablation rather than conventional methods.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
The Epidemiology of Chronic Venous Insufficiency and Varicose Veins.Annals of epidemiology,march 2005
Frullini A, Cavezzi A. Sclerosing foam in the treatment of varicose veins and telangiectasias: history and analysis of safety and complications.Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:11-15.
Rautio T, Ohinmaa A, Pera¨ la¨ J, et al. Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping
operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with
comparison of costs. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:958–65.
Sto¨ tter L, Schaaf I, Bockelbrink A, et al. [Radiofrequency obliteration, invagination, or cryostripping:
which is the best tolerated by the patients?]. Phlebologie 2005;34:19–24 [in German]
Hinchliffe RJ, Ubhi J, Beech A, et al. A prospective randomised controlled trial of VNUS
closure versus surgery for the treatment of recurrent long saphenous varicose veins. Eur
J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;31(2):212–8.
Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, et al. Prospective Randomised Study of Endovenous Radiofrequency Obliteration (Closure) Versus Ligation and Vein Stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005;29(1):67–73.
Pichot O, Sessa C, Chandler JG, et al. Role of duplex imaging in endovenous obliteration for
primary venous insufficiency. J Endovasc Ther 2000;7:451–9.
Weiss RA, Weiss MA. Controlled radiofrequency endovenous occlusion using a unique
radiofrequency catheter under duplex guidance to eliminate saphenous varicose vein reflux:
a 2-year follow-up. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:38–42.
Rautio T, Ohinmaa A, Pera¨ la¨ J, et al. Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping
operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with
comparison of costs. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:958–65.
Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, et al. Prospective Randomized Study of Endovenous Radiofrequency Obliteration (Closure) versus Ligation and Stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVES study). J Vasc Surg 2003;38:207–14.
Goldman MP, Amiry S. Closure of the greater saphenous vein with endoluminal radiofrequencythermal heating of the vein wall in combination with ambulatory phlebectomy: 50
patients with more than 6-month follow-up. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:29–31.
Merchant RF, DePalma RG, Kabnick LS. Endovascular obliteration of saphenous reflux:
A multicenter study. J Vasc Surg 2002;35(6):1190–6.
Rautio TT, Pera¨ la¨ JM, Wiik HT, et al. Endovenous obliteration with radiofrequencyresistive heating for greater saphenous vein insufficiency: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;13:569–75.
Gale SS, Dosick SM, Seiwert AJ, et al. Regarding ‘‘Deep venous thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation of greater saphenous vein.’’ J Vasc Surg 2005;41(2):374.
Sybrandy JEM, Wittens CHA. Initial experiences in endovenous treatment of saphenous
vein reflux. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:1207–12.
Proebstle TM.Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: First clinical experience.journal of vascular surgery.47,151-156
Manfrini S, Gasbarro V, Danielsson G, et al. Endovenous management of saphenous vein
reflux. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:330–42.
Chandler JG, Pichot O, Sessa C, et al. Treatment of primary venous insufficiency by
endovenous saphenous vein obliteration. Vasc Surg 2000;34:201–14.
Dauplaise TL, Weiss RA. Duplex-guided endovascular occlusion of refluxing saphenous
veins. Journal of Vascular Technology 2001;25:79–82.
Dwerryhouse S, Davies B, Harradine K, et al. Stripping the long saphenous vein reduces the
rate of reoperation for recurrent varicose veins: five-year results of a randomized trial. J Vasc
Surg 1999;29:589–92.
Rutgers PH, Kitslaar PJ. Randomized trial of stripping versus high ligation combined with
sclerotherapy in the treatment of the incompetent greater saphenous vein. Am J Surg 1994;
:311–5.
Neglen P, Einarsson E, Eklof B. The functional long-term value of different types of treatment
for saphenous vein incompetence. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1993;34:295–301.
Munn SR, Morton JB, Macbeth WA, et al. To strip or not to strip the long saphenous vein?
A varicose veins trial. Br J Surg 1981;68:426–8.
Hammarsten J, Pedersen P, Cederlund CG, et al. Long saphenous vein saving surgery for
varicose veins. A long-term follow-up. Eur J Vasc Surg 1990;4:361–4.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
An Initiative of The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University