Cover Image

Maxillomandibular Changes Following Extraction and Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatment: A cephalometric study

Evan. A. Clement, Xavier Dhayanandh, Sha .

Abstract


Objectives: The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate the skeletal maxillomandibular changes after     orthodontic treatment through Steiner’s cephalometric    analysis.

 Materials & Methods: Pre and post treatment cephalometric radiographs of 50 orthodontic patients were used for this retrospective study, where they have been divided into two groups (25 Extraction and 25 Non extraction cases).   Evaluation of Steiners - SNA, SNB and ANB angles in both the Pre and Post treatment cephalogram were done.

 Statistics: The data was tabulated and computed using SPSS software version 21.0.The Pre and Post cephalometric parameter were analysed through paired sample T tests, by calculating the mean difference, Standard deviation and Standard error and paired differences.

 Results: ANB angle showed a decrease of 1.12° among the patients treated with extraction procedures, and the ANB angle showed increase of 0.2° among patients treated with non extraction procedures.

 Conclusion: The result of the above study suggested that the ANB reduced in patients who underwent extraction    orthodontic therapy and the patients treated as non extraction did not show much significant difference.

 Keywords: ANB angle, Extraction, Steiners analysis,        Non-Extraction.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Hofrath H. Bedeutung der Ro¨ntgenfern und Abstands Aufnahme fu¨r die Diagnostik der Kieferanomalien. Fortschr Orthod 1931;1:231–58.

Downs WB. Variation in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948;34:812–40.

Dr. Nabanita Baruah, BDS, Dr. Mitali Bora,MDS,FICD(U.S.A).Cephalometric evaluation based on steiners analysis on young adults of assam. JIOS Journal.

Pacini AJ. Roentgen ray anthropometry of the skull. J Radiol 1922;3:322–31. 2.

Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1: 45–66.

Alexander Jacobson, DMD, MS , MDS , PhD. Radiographic cephalometry. Edition 1995.

Servoss JM. Derivation of acceptable arrangements in the Steiner analysis. Angle Orthod 1971;41:146–9

Servoss JM. The acceptability of Steiner’s acceptable compromises. Am J Orthod 1973;63:161–5.

Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. AMJ Orthod1953;39:79.

Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice . Angle orthod1959;29:8.

Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment . AMJ Orthod1960;46:721.

Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1: 45–66

Bravo LA. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:31–42.

I4. smail SF, Moss JP, Hennessy R. Three-dimensional assessment of the effects of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on the face. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:244–256.

Kocadereli I. Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:67–72.

Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. 2002 JCO Study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 2 Breakdowns of selected variables. J Clin Orthod 2002;36:627–36.

Ongkosuwito EM, Katsaros C, Bodegom JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Digitale cephalometrie [Digital cephalometrics]. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2004;111: 266–70.

R. Scott Conley Christopher Jernigan Soft Tissue Changes after Upper Premolar Extraction in Class II Camouflage TherapyAngle Orthod 2006;76:59–65.

Marisana Piano Seben, Fabricio Pinelli Valarelli, Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas Rodrigo Hermont Cançado, Aristeu Correa Bittencourt Neto Cephalometric changes in Class II division 1 patients treated with two maxillary premolars extraction Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 July-Aug; 18(4):61-9

Jagan Nath Sharma Skeletal and Soft Tissue Point A and B Changes Following Orthodontic Treatment of Nepalese Class I Bimaxillary Protrusive Patients (Angle Orthod 2010; 80:91–96.)

Guilherme Janson; Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo; Ana Niederberger Changes in apical base sagittal relationship in Class II malocclusion treatment with and without premolar extractions: A systematic review and meta-analysis (Angle Orthod. 2017;87:338–355)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

An Initiative of The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University