COMPARSION OF FOLEYS, FOLEYS WITH EASI (EXTRA AMNIOTIC SALINE INFUSION) FOR INDUCTION OF LABOUR IN WOMEN WITH UNFAVOURABLE CERVIX.
Abstract
To compare the efficacy of transcervical
foleys catheter alone to transcervical foleys
catheter with extra amniotic saline
infusion for labour infusion and cervical
ripening in women with unfavourable cervix.
Study type is Observational study. It
was conducted in Department of Obstetrics
and Gynaecology, PSG Hospitals,
Coimbatore.Study subjects were women
presenting for labour induction with a singleton,
cephalic, intact membranes and
unfavourable cervix with adequate pelvis
bishops score less than or equal to 5.
Eligible women were randomly selected
and assigned to receive either Foleys
catheter alone or Foleys with Extra Amniotic
Saline Infusion(EASI). The primary
study outcome was induction to delivery
interval, secondary outcome includes
maternal and fetal outcome.Fifty women
met eligibility criteria and were randomly
assigned(Foleys n-25 Foleys with EASI n
-25). Study
subjects were of similar parity, gestational
age and bishops score. The median induction
to delivery interval for foleys alone and
Foleys with EASI was found to be similar
(16-20 hours p-0.107). Also it was noted
that there was no statistical difference between
the two groups withregard to mode
of delivery. In women with unfavourable
cervix, there was no significant difference
in efficacy of labour induction of Foleys
alone group and Foleys with EASI group.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Guinn DA, Geopfert AR, Christine
M, Owen J, Hauth JC. Extra amniotic
saline, laminaria, or prostaglandin E
(2) gel for labor induction with unfavorable
cervix: a randomized control
trial. Obstet Gyecol 2000;96:106-12.
Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective
induction. Obstet Gynecol
;24:266-8
Farrigton PF ward .K Normal labour,
delivery and puerperium . Lippicoatt
Williams and wikin. 1999, pp 91-
Trofatter KF Jr. Cervical ripening.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 35:476-
O’Brein WF. Cervical ripening and
labor induction: progress and challenges.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1995;
:221-223.
Niromanesh S, Mosavi – Jarrahia.A,
Samkhaniani F. Intracervical Foley
catheter ballon vs. prostaglangin in
preinduction cervical ripening. Int J
Gynecol. Obstet 2003;81 : 23-27 (s)
Br Commonw .MP.Embry,
B.G.Mollison the unfavourable cervix
and induction of labour using cervical
ballon. J.Obset Gynaecol 1967 74 44-
(s)
Barkai G, Cohen SB, Kees S, Lusky
A, Margalit V, Mashiah S, Schiff E. Induction
of labor with use of Foley
catheter and extraamniotic corticosteroids.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 ; 177:
-1148
Karjane NW, Brock EL, Walsh SW.
Induction of labor using a Foley ballon,
with and without extraamniotic saline
infusion. Obstet and Gynecol
;107:234-9.
Baacke K,Ferguson R .Inflammation
in cervical ripening with a Foley catheter?
Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine,
San Francisco 2007 Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2006;195S102
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
An Initiative of The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University