Outcome of SWL for Lower Ureteric Calculi
Abstract
Objective To determine the efficacy of
extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy
(SWL) in the treatment of lower ureteric
calculi.Materials and methods Patients
with lower ureteric calculi selected for
treatment by SWL from July 2006June
2011 were analyzed retrospectively. Outcomes
assessed were stone clearance,
complications and retreatment including
the need for ureteroscopy. Complications
like sepsis, hydronephrosis and deterioration
of renal function were documented.
Indications for ureteroscopy included
failure of fragmentation and failure
to clear fragments at follow up. Results
A total of 59 patients were studied.
There were 51 males and 8 females with
age ranging from 19 - 74 years (mean
age 43 years). Thirty seven patients had
left sided calculi, 21 right sided and one
patient had bilateral lower ureteric calculi.
The size of the calculi ranged from 5
to 15 mm (mean size 8.44 mm). The
number of shocks ranged from 2000 to
8000 (mean no. of shocks 4449). The
duration of follow up varied from
2 to 30 days (mean 11.4 days). Ureteroscopy
was required in 11 patients. 44 of
patients with stone size in the range 11-15
mm required ureteroscopy. Of the 11 patients,
six had ureteroscopy for failure to
fragment and five for failure of clearance.
There was no reported UTI or deterioration
of renal function during the study. Conclusion
SWL is a safe effective treatment for
lower ureteric calculi of size less than 10
mm. But for larger stones (10mm), the
rates of failure and need for intervention is
higher.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Devarajan R, Ashraf M, Beck RO,
Lemberger RJ, Taylor MC. Holmium:
YAGlasertripsy for ureteric
calculi: An experience of 300 procedures.
Br J Ur o l 1998;82:342–347
Andrew T, Gareth J. Treatment of
Lower Ureteral Stones Using the Dornier
Compact DeltaLithotripter. J of Endourology
; Vol. 17, 369-371.
Pettersson B, Tiselius HG. Extracorporeal
shock wavelithotripsy of proximal
and distal ureteralstones. Eur
U r o l 1 9 8 8 ; 1 4 : 1 8 4 _ / 8 .
Tiselius HG, Pettersson B, Andersson
A. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
of stones in the mid ureter. J
Urol1989;141:280_/2.
Cameron-Strange A. Extracorporeal
shock-wave lithotripsy for distalureteric
c a l c u l i . A u s t N Z J
S u r g 1 9 9 2 ; 6 2 : 2 8 3 – 2 8 6 .
Anderson KR, Keetch DW, Albala
DM, Chandhoke PS, McClennanBL,
Clayman RV. Optimaltherapy for the
distal ureteral stone:Extracorporeal
shock wave lithotripsy vs. ureteroscopy.
JUrol1994;152:62–65.
Pearle MS, Nadler R, Bercowsky E,
et al. Prospective randomizedtrial comparing
shock wavelithotripsy and ureteroscopy
for managementof distal ureteral
calculi. J Urol 2001;166:1255–
Pace KT, Weir MJ, Tariq N, Honey
RJD’A. Low success rate ofrepeat
shock wave lithotripsy forureteral
stones after failed initialtreatment. J
U r o l 2 0 0 0 ; 1 6 4 : 1 9 0 5 – 1 9 0 7 .
Yip SK, Lee FC, Tam PC, Leung
SY. Outpatient treatment ofmiddle and
lower ureteric stones:Extracorporeal
shock wavelithotripsy versus ureteroscopic
laser lithotripsy. Ann Acad-
M e d S i n g a p o r e
;27:515–519.
Chacko J, Moore M, Sankey N,
Chandhoke PS, Does a slower treatmentrate
impact the efficacy
of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
for solitary kidney or ureteral
stones?J Urol.2006;175(4)1370-73.
Bhagat SK, Chacko NK, Kekre
NS, Devasia A et al; Is there a role
for tamsulosin in shock wave
lithotripsy for renal and ureteral calculi?
J Urol. 2007; 177(6):2185-88.
LosekRL,Mauro LS, Efficacy of
tamsulosin with extracorporeal shock
wave lithotripsy for passage
of renal and ureteral calculi.
AnnPharmacother. 2008; 42(5):
-97.
Yahong Xu I , Yi Lu II , Jian Li
III , Shunwen Luo et al; A metaanalysis
of the efficacy of
ureteroscopic lithotripsy and extracorporeal
shock wave lithotripsy on
ureteral calculi;Acta Cir. Bras.
, vol.29 no.5.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
An Initiative of The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University