Cover Image

A Cephalometric appraisal of Steiner’s analysis normal occlusion in Chennai suburban and rural area of population in the age group of 14 – 21 years

Karunanithi C Rajmohan M Nanda Balan .

Abstract


Aim: The purpose of the study is to formulate                  Cephalometric norms of the Chennai suburban and rural areas of population. Design: A cross sectional study sample selected on the basis of Class 1 occlusion. Materials and Methods: The samples for the present study comprised of pre-treatment lateral cephalogram taken in natural head position of 64 participants (males 32 and females 32). All these cephalometric radiograph were manually traced,                analysed, interpreted using the landmark values given by Steiner analysis. The student t test, standard deviation and mean value were calculated to compare the standard norms.               Result and Conclusion: The result of this study showed that maxilla and mandible were more protruded. Sn occlusal plane angle and mandibular plane angle were smaller than mean value. Both maxilla and mandible incisors were                 proclined.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Cotton W.N, Taleano W.S, Wong W.W. The down analysis applied to three other ethnic groups. Angle orthod 1951;21:213 – 220.

H.A.Mohammed, M.I Abu Hassan, S F Hussain. Cephalometric evaluation for Malaysian Malay by Steiner’s analysis. Scientific research and essays. Feb 2011;6(3) 627-634.

Barvah Nabanita, Bora Mitali. Cephalometric evaluation based on the Steiner’s analysis on young adults in Assam. I O S. Jan – March 2009; 43(1) 17 – 22.

A comparison of Cephalofacial relationship. Angle orthod 1960;30(4): 223-224.

Familial resemblances in cranio facial Greek families.

Abst in Am J Orthod 1954.

Haralbakis.H. Cephalometric standard compared to down and Steiners’s analysis. Angle orthod 1990;60(1):35-40.

kotak V B. Cephalometric evaluation of Indian girls with neutral occlusion. J Indian Dent Assoc.1964; 30:183-97.

Carlos J Garcia. Cephalometric evaluation of Mexican Americans using the Down’s and Steiner’s analysis. Am J Orthod. 1975; 68(1):67-74.

Planning commission of central Tibetan administration. Demographic survey of Tibetans in exile 2009.

Burstone CJ, Legan HL. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J oral Surg. 1980; 38(10):744-755.

Profit RW etal. Contemporary orthodontics. Orthodontic diagnosis. 4th edition. Louis Mosby Publishers; 2007: 201-217.

Burstone CJ, James RB, Lean H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometric for orthognathic surgery. J oral Surg. 1978; 36(4):269-277.

Alcade RE etal. Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. J oral MaxillofacialSurge 1998; 56(2):129-34.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

An initiative of The Tamil Nadu Dr M.G.R. Medical University